Event contracts—also known as event futures—are financial instruments that allow traders to speculate on the outcomes of specific real-world events. These can include political elections, sports championships, economic reports, or even weather conditions. Each contract is structured as a binary bet—paying out a fixed amount if the predicted event occurs (“yes”) or expiring worthless (“no”).
While such products have existed in various informal forms for decades, they were traditionally classified as gambling and were prohibited in the United States. However, with the evolution of digital platforms and regulatory oversight, event contracts are now offered under approved frameworks by exchanges like Kalshi and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), both supervised by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Key Takeaways
-
Event contracts are binary financial instruments that pay out if a specified event occurs.
-
They allow investors to speculate on outcomes ranging from politics and sports to economic indicators.
-
These contracts have long been controversial, with regulators debating whether they constitute investment tools or forms of gambling.
-
Their market value shifts based on collective sentiment about an event’s likelihood.
-
Major CFTC-regulated platforms offering these contracts include Kalshi and CME Group.
Understanding Event Contracts
The rise of event contracts reflects the growing intersection between finance, technology, and popular culture. A few major forces have contributed to their emergence:
-
Expansion of speculative finance:
Once used primarily for hedging, futures and options trading have become increasingly dominated by speculation. This shift set the stage for new instruments like event futures, which focus solely on predicting outcomes. -
Normalization of gambling culture:
The legalization of sports betting in the late 2010s—and the proliferation of mobile betting apps—blurred the line between gambling and investing. Many retail traders began alternating between sports betting apps and online trading platforms, reinforcing a speculative mindset. -
Gamification of investing:
Modern trading apps employ design elements such as rewards, bright visuals, and notifications that mimic gaming interfaces. This trend—sometimes called “gamblification”—encourages impulsive participation rather than analytical investing. -
Retail investor boom:
Easy access to trading platforms and zero-commission models attracted a surge of inexperienced retail investors. A 2022 FINRA study showed that while two-thirds of users traded online, most failed basic financial literacy tests, reflecting a widening knowledge gap. -
Evolution of futures markets:
Since the 1970s, the CFTC has overseen an expanding universe of futures products—from agriculture to currencies, stock indices, and even weather. Event futures are viewed by some as the next logical step in that progression.
A Controversial History
Event-based speculation has existed for more than a century, though often under different guises. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, bucket shops allowed individuals to bet on stock price movements without owning shares—activities later banned for their resemblance to gambling and susceptibility to manipulation.
In modern times, regulators have taken a similar stance toward event contracts.
In 2012, the North American Derivatives Exchange (Nadex) attempted to list political futures tied to the outcomes of U.S. elections. The CFTC blocked these contracts, citing three major objections:
-
Violation of gaming prohibitions:
Under CFTC Rule 40.11, contracts referencing terrorism, war, gaming, or unlawful activities are banned as contrary to public interest. -
Lack of economic purpose:
The CFTC ruled that election contracts could not be justified as hedging instruments, since election outcomes are too unpredictable to serve a legitimate economic function. -
Threat to election integrity:
Regulators feared such contracts could incentivize manipulation of electoral outcomes for financial gain.
Only in the late 2010s and early 2020s did the CFTC begin granting designations to certain platforms, such as Kalshi, to operate as Designated Contract Markets (DCMs). Others, like PredictIt, function under limited “no-action” letters—temporary permissions allowing them to operate without full regulatory recognition.
Event Contracts vs. Traditional Futures
Unlike conventional futures, which derive value from price changes in commodities, indices, or currencies, event futures are driven by probability. Their worth fluctuates according to market sentiment about the likelihood of a particular outcome.
CME Group introduced its first event futures in 2022, covering markets like Bitcoin and equity indices. Kalshi, meanwhile, offers a broader range—from macroeconomic releases to entertainment events—positioning itself as a platform for “hedging everyday risks.”
Kalshi’s co-founder Tarek Mansour called the approval “a paradigm shift in U.S. financial history,” suggesting that such tools democratize access to risk management. However, critics argue that contracts tied to events like celebrity album releases or movie awards are more akin to betting markets than hedging tools.
Kalshi spokesperson Samantha Schwab defended the platform’s legitimacy, noting:
“Every contract has a hedging use case, even the less obvious ones. People once said grain futures were gambling before the Supreme Court ruled they were essential for risk management.”
Still, regulators remain wary. As the boundaries between investment and gambling blur, event futures raise ethical and economic questions about speculation, addiction, and market integrity.
Comparison: Traditional vs. Event Futures
| Feature | Traditional Futures | Event Futures |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Price discovery, hedging, portfolio diversification | Speculation, hedging event-specific risks |
| Underlying Asset | Commodities, currencies, indices | Outcomes of specific events (e.g., elections, weather, data releases) |
| Valuation Basis | Asset price fluctuations | Probability of event occurrence |
| Settlement | Cash or physical delivery | Binary payout (fixed amount or $0) |
| Regulatory View | Established investment tool | Often debated as gambling-like |
| Traders | Hedgers, investors, speculators | Primarily speculators and bettors |
| Liquidity | High for major contracts | Limited, depending on event popularity |
| Risk Factors | Market, counterparty, liquidity risk | Event outcome, insider trading, regulatory risk |
| Margin Requirements | Typically significant | Usually minimal due to small contract sizes |
Features of Event Contracts
Event contracts share several defining characteristics:
-
Binary payout structure: Each contract pays its full value if the event occurs and zero otherwise.
-
Event-driven expiration: Contracts expire when the underlying event’s result is determined.
-
Daily settlement: Contracts are settled in cash based on whether the event has occurred that day.
-
Capped risk: The maximum potential loss is limited to the initial purchase price.
-
Transparent pricing: Contract prices (e.g., $0.70) imply the market’s estimated probability (70%) that the event will occur.
Types of Events Covered
Event futures markets now encompass a diverse range of categories, including:
-
Monetary policy: Federal Reserve or ECB rate decisions.
-
Economic data: GDP, inflation, employment, or consumer sentiment.
-
Corporate earnings: Company performance and profit announcements.
-
Politics: Election outcomes and policy decisions.
-
Weather: Temperature, precipitation, or extreme weather events.
-
Entertainment: Award winners, movie revenues, or celebrity releases.
-
Sports: Outcomes of major tournaments like the Super Bowl or World Series.
Advantages of Event Contracts
Proponents cite several potential benefits:
-
Exposure to event-driven volatility:
Traders can capitalize on price movements linked to scheduled news, data releases, or political events. -
Defined risk:
Event contracts have a capped downside—traders can only lose what they initially invest. -
Portfolio diversification:
Returns from event contracts often have low correlation with traditional assets like stocks or bonds. -
Transparency and simplicity:
The binary payoff makes outcomes easy to understand—either the event happens, or it doesn’t.
As Kalshi’s Schwab explained,
“Users can trade directly on the risks that matter to them. It’s a risk management tool that was once reserved for institutional investors.”
Drawbacks and Risks
Despite the appeal, event contracts carry notable risks:
-
Addiction risk: Their gambling-like structure and accessibility through mobile platforms can foster compulsive trading behavior.
-
Insider trading potential: Contracts linked to corporate or personal decisions—such as CEO resignations or product launches—could invite abuse.
-
Market unpredictability: Unexpected outcomes can cause abrupt, uncontrollable price swings.
-
Liquidity issues: Many contracts attract limited participation, creating difficulties exiting positions.
-
Volatility and slippage: Sudden news can shift contract prices dramatically (e.g., $0.90 to $0.10).
-
Ethical concerns: Election-related contracts could threaten public trust by creating incentives to manipulate outcomes.
Pros and Cons Summary
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Access to event-based volatility | Addiction risk |
| Limited downside exposure | Insider trading possibilities |
| Portfolio diversification | Market unpredictability |
| Simple and transparent structure | Liquidity and volatility issues |
| Threats to electoral integrity |
How to Trade Event Futures
-
Select a regulated platform:
Use reputable exchanges like Kalshi or CME Group that are registered with the CFTC. -
Open a trading account:
Complete KYC verification and fund your account. -
Analyze upcoming events:
Study event calendars, assess probabilities, and identify trading opportunities. -
Place trades:
Choose “Yes” or “No” contracts based on your expectations. -
Manage or close positions:
You can exit early if prices move in your favor or hold until expiration for full payout.
💡 Tip: Always use stop-loss orders to limit potential losses and prevent emotional decision-making.
Event Futures vs. Prediction Markets
Although both involve forecasting event outcomes, event futures differ from prediction markets in structure and regulation. Event futures are treated as financial derivatives on regulated exchanges. Prediction markets, by contrast, often function under academic or research exemptions, targeting general speculation rather than formal investment.
Event Futures vs. Binary Options
While both offer binary payouts, binary options are tied to price levels of financial assets (like currencies or stocks), not independent events. Binary options also carry a higher regulatory risk, as many unregulated brokers have engaged in fraud. Event futures, when traded on approved platforms, operate under stricter oversight.
Historical Origins
One of the earliest organized event-based markets was the Iowa Electronic Markets (IEM), founded in 1988 by the University of Iowa’s Tippie College of Business. It allowed small-scale, research-based trading on political elections—effectively serving as a forerunner to modern prediction and event markets.
The Bottom Line
Event futures represent a novel intersection of finance, speculation, and data-driven forecasting. These contracts allow participants to bet—or hedge—on real-world outcomes, from elections and weather to economic data and entertainment results.
While they can provide valuable hedging opportunities and market insight, they also raise significant ethical and regulatory questions. The future of event contracts will depend on whether regulators and investors view them as legitimate risk management tools or simply another form of financialized gambling.